Groq
Language model integration

Groq inference for voice agents — the shortest silence in the business

Groq runs open-weight models on custom LPU hardware at throughput GPUs do not reach. On a voice call that translates into one thing you can actually hear: the agent starts replying almost as soon as you stop talking.

What is Groq?

Groq is an inference provider that runs models on Language Processing Units — purpose-built silicon for sequential token generation rather than general-purpose GPUs. Depending on the model it serves between roughly 276 and 1,500+ tokens per second, against the 40–100 typical of GPU-based providers. It hosts open-weight models including Llama 4 and Llama 3.x, Mixtral, Gemma, DeepSeek R1 distills and Whisper.

Why it matters on a voice call

In a voice conversation, the model's generation speed is not an abstraction — it is the length of the silence after the caller stops talking. A model that generates twice as fast halves that pause. Groq is the clearest lever available on that number, which is why it is the usual choice for agents where responsiveness beats reasoning depth.

At a glance

Groq on Vomyra

What you get, stated plainly enough to check.

Capability
Detail
Role in the stack
Inference layer for open-weight reasoning models
Hardware
Custom LPUs built for sequential token generation
Throughput
~1,000+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.1 8B; ~250+ on Llama 3.3 70B
Models hosted
Llama 4, Llama 3.x, Mixtral, Gemma, DeepSeek R1 distills, Whisper
Best for
Agents where turn latency matters more than deep reasoning
Access
Managed on Vomyra plans, or bring your own Groq API key
How it works

Running Groq on Vomyra

Four steps, none of which involve writing telephony code.

  1. 1

    Choose a Groq-hosted model

    Select an open-weight model served on Groq as your agent's brain. Vomyra handles the routing and failover.

  2. 2

    Pair it with fast synthesis

    Groq removes the think-time; Cartesia removes the speak-time. Together they produce the tightest turn in the stack.

  3. 3

    Keep prompts tight

    Fast inference rewards concise system prompts. Long, branching prompts spend the latency budget Groq just gave you back.

  4. 4

    Measure turn time, not tokens

    Vomyra reports end-to-end turn latency per call, which is the number that actually correlates with call quality.

Why Vomyra

What Vomyra adds to Groq

Latency you can hear

Generation speed is the silence after the caller stops. Groq is the most direct lever on it available anywhere.

Open weights, sane economics

Open-weight models on fast hardware keep cost per call low at volume, without the per-token pricing of frontier proprietary models.

Stacks with everything else

Groq for thinking, Cartesia for speaking, Deepgram for hearing, your carrier for reaching. Each layer is chosen independently.

In production

Where teams use Groq

  • High-volume outbound where per-turn latency compounds across millions of turns
  • Simple qualification and routing agents that do not need frontier reasoning
  • Cost-sensitive campaigns running at national scale
  • Agents replacing IVR menus, where speed matters more than nuance
  • Latency-critical inbound where callers abandon on any perceptible pause
FAQ

Groq questions

What does Groq do for a voice agent?

It runs the reasoning model on custom LPU hardware that generates tokens substantially faster than conventional GPU inference. On a phone call that shows up as a shorter silence between the caller finishing and the agent starting to reply.

Is Groq the same as Grok?

No, and they are constantly confused. Groq is an inference hardware and cloud provider that serves open-weight models very fast. Grok is xAI's family of language models. Both run on Vomyra, and you can use them together or separately.

Which models does Groq run for voice agents?

Open-weight families including Llama 4 and Llama 3.x, Mixtral, Gemma and DeepSeek R1 distills, plus Whisper for speech. Vomyra exposes the supported ones as model choices on an agent and handles routing and failover behind the selection.

When should I not use Groq?

When the agent needs deep reasoning over long, policy-heavy scripts. Open-weight models on fast hardware trade some reasoning depth for speed. For complex compliance-bound conversations, a frontier model like Claude or GPT-4.1 is usually the better call.

Can I combine Groq with other providers?

That is the normal setup. Groq for inference, Cartesia or ElevenLabs for the voice, Deepgram for transcription where a classic pipeline is used, and your own carrier or a Vomyra number for telephony. Each layer is chosen independently.